Saturday, June 23, 2018 - Visit count: 206

It is possible for Zionism Regime to start a war

Strategic patience and retreat in front of the west is a decline in a success time and that is the worst choice for a victorious army.

Sa'ad-Allah Zarei: It is possible for Zionism Regime to start a war/ 3 important and determinative factors for Russia in Syria. Strategic patience and retreat in front of the west is a decline in a success time and that is the worst choice for a victorious army.

Sa'ad-Allah Zarei in the meeting of “the prospect of the US and Israel’s recent attacks to Syria and assessing the possible reactions of Iran” said that we have passed difficult conditions and now it is time for us to see the results of our resistance. Strategic patience and retreat in front of the west is a decline in a success time and that is the worst choice for a victorious army.

Dean of strategic studies institute of Andishe-Sazane-Noor said: The war with terrorist groups is at its end and groups like Al-Nusra Front have arrived in their end line.

Dissatisfaction of western countries because of ending terrorism in Syria shows that their promises to fight terrorism were a cover to carry out their programs and political goals that are behind the curtains.

This professor of university pointed to the dissatisfaction of Western countries, the Zionist regime and Saudi Arabia from the great successes in fighting terrorism stated that: America, Europe, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Zionism Regime had claimed wrongly that they are part of the anti-terrorism coalition. If their coalition was to fight terrorism they should be happy now by these victories but they are very unhappy.

This university professor continues that military operation of America in Syria after the defeat of terrorist groups shows that their promises to fight terrorism were a cover to carry out their programs and political goals that are behind the curtain. Since in the new situation of the region they have failed to reach their goals they are trying to change the situation.

Dean of strategic studies institute of Andishe-Sazane-Noor said about evaluation of Iran’s reaction to western and Zionism Regime’s planning and attacks in Syria and debates which are proposed in Washington, Tel Aviv, Ankara, Riyadh, and Brussels said: for assessing the level of Iran’s reaction to these attacks we must define an appropriate reply according to their actions and effects of their actions.

The region in the post-Daesh (ISIS) will be a firmer position for resistance axis and this has been unbearable for western countries and also it is against their strategic goals in the region. So we should not expect they accept this success of resistance axis very soon.

Pointing to destructive and offensive actions of West in Syria against Iran and resistance axis he added: The result of actions of enemies of resistance axis has made Iran embolden, fresher, more successful and more attractive from the view of nations of the region and this has given a new opportunity for resistance axis.

He continues, according to expressions of western countries, we can conclude that in the era of post-Daesh (ISIS) this region will be a firmer position for resistance axis and this has been unbearable for western countries and also it is against their strategic goals in the region. So we should not expect they accept this success of resistance axis very soon.

Zarei added today resistance axis is standing in a position that can see the result of long resistance and costs that has paid for this resistance.

We have passed difficult and complex situations and now it is the time that we stand and see the results of our long resistance.

There are not many costs for us in the future. The proposal of Strategic patience and retreat in front of the west is a decline in a success time and that is the worst choice for a victorious army.

Zare’i pointed to some wrong statements about resistance axis and said: some are pretending that there will be many costs for us and for preventing these costs we should set a precedent and take strategic patience instead.

We do not want to fight against any country, but if our achievements are threatened we will fight to save our achievements.

Dean of strategic studies institute of Andishe-Sazane-Noor clarified that our second choice against threats and western planning in Syria is that we clearly say we do not want to fight against any country, but if our achievements are threatened we will fight to save our achievements.

He continued: Western countries themselves are the ones who established terrorist groups in Syria and other regions and they are not courage enough to fight against them. Today, resistance axis which has started fighting terrorism in a difficult situation and has sacrificed many of its forces in this battle is under pressure to retreat. Of course, our nation is not willing to share the achievements of resistance axis with its enemies which were the main creator and supporter of these terrorist groups.

The Zionist regime has been very sensitive and may be the starter of a war. This war may happen in Syria.

This commentator of south-west Asia said about the perspective of the region that, according to the situation of the region and expressions of western countries and their alliances, we can see two prospects for the region: First Zionist regime is very angry and panic to the situation of the region. Performing the comedy show by Benyamin Netanyahu on 30 of April 2018 and showing some CDs, he tried to show an image of a security threat from Iran but the show which he played revealed Israel’s being a security threat than Iran.

He continued the result that we could get from this show is that Zionist regime has been very sensitive and may be the starter of a war. If this war happens, it may happen in Syria. But the Victorious of this war surely won’t be Israel because the resistance axis has succeeded in the war against terrorist groups in Syria and will not kneel in this war.

Israeli Regime is to start a one to two weeks war in Syria But if this war starts it would not end in one or two weeks.

Israeli Regime is to start a one to two weeks war in Syria, but the question is what will they be able to finish the war in determined period? It should be said that with the experience we have got in wars of the region they would not be able to end this war. For example, Saudi Arabia wanted to finish the Yemen war in 10 days but now after 38 months, they have not been able to end the war.

Zionist regime, the United States, and Europe is evaluating our determination. If one united voice is projected from Iran they will change their mind of changing the situation of the region and finally, they will find out that they cannot fight with resistance axis. 

Dean of strategic studies institute of Andishe-Sazane-Noor said that the west has started a psychological and media war against resistance axis, especially with Iran. The Zionist regime, the United States, and Europe is evaluating our determination. If one united voice is projected from Iran they will change their mind of changing the situation of the region finally they will find that they cannot fight with resistance axis. 

He added: They want to see whether a united voice from elites and officials is projected or not?

Zarei clarifies that if one united voice is heard by the enemies they will doubt about their programs for the region and they will kneel in front of resistance axis and its successes.

Apparently new plan of the west is the presence of defeated 40 allied countries in the rebuilding of Syria but actually, they want to make the political system of Syria fragile to easily establish their desired government.

Zarei in replying to the question about the failure of 40 allied countries mentioned: America and Europe are following a plan with deceiving appearance. Their plan is to ask these 40 countries to take a role in rebuilding Syria.

He added: they claim that they want to rebuild the ruins of Syria but in fact, they are following a plan that by changing the situation in the region they establish a fragile political system.

For reaching to this goal they are using the cover of human rights, rebuilding, collective participation, collective responsibility, taking care of refugees and etc. while these refugees are suffering from the war that the west has imposed to Syria. 

Sa'ad-Allah Zarei rejected the claim of the west and its alliances that claims there are 11 millions of displaced people inside and out of Syria and said the number of homeless people is about 6 million people whom 3/6 million of them are inside the Syria and 2/6 million of them are out of Syria, so the west has increased the statistics to utilize refugees issue for continuing its presence in Syria.

Dean of strategic studies institute of Andishe-Sazane-Noor in a reply the question that why Islamic awakening in other countries like Egypt, Bahrein, Tunisia and other Islamic countries that the opponents of rulers were millions of  protesting  people but the protests didn’t lead to war and violence but in the case of Syria with small protests in small cities it led to violence and long war, said: this is a sign of exact planning of the west and it’s alliances to change the political system in Syria.

Since Zionist regime has noticed the Daesh (ISIS) is in decline has started its attacks to Syria. The number of these attacks has reached to 100.

He added the governments of America, Israel, and their alliances have played the main role in Syria and to continue this presence in Syria they are pretending to sympathy with displaced people and ruins of Syria while they had the main role in bringing this situation for Syria and already they are attacking to Syria.

The United States of America has attacked to some spots in Syria on 14th of April and the number of Israel’s attacks to Syria has reached to 100 attacks.

He mentioned that since the time that Zionist regime has noticed that the Daesh(ISIS) is in decline it has started its attacks to Syria. Rebuilding in Syria includes security rebuilding. At a time the west is talking about the rebuilding of Syria, they are attacking to Syria and blemish the security of Syria. 

The west claims that Bashar al-Assad is not popular in his country while Zionist Regime which is being supported by them is the most unpopular government of the world and also the Sultanic Regime of Saudi Arabia is the most unpopular Arabic state.

In reply to another question, he said: if popularity is a criterion in changing a government or regime, the Zionist regime and its officials should be questioned more than others. The west claims that Bashar al-Assad is not popular in his country while Zionist Regime which is supported by them is the most unpopular government of the world and also the Sultanic Regime of Saudi Arabia is the most unpopular Arabic state. In addition to that, the results of last election and actual facts in Syria reject the idea that Bashar al-Assad is not popular.

This professor added that nature of the Zionist regime is that an army has changed to a nation! And Saudi Arabia is a Sultanic Regime which doesn’t receive its authority from its people so these regimes should be said to be unpopular not the Syrian regime which has been selected by direct vote of people.

Presence of millions of protesters in Egypt, Bahrein, Tunisia and other Islamic countries didn't lead to war and violence but in Syria, small protests led to violence and long war; this is a sign of exact planning of the west to change the political system in Syria.

Zarei compared the last revolutions in the region with Syria and said: in Egypt in Gahere square of Altahrir and other major cities there were millions of people protesting against the government. Revolution of people of Tunisia against Bin Ali, in Yemen against Ali Abdullah Saleh and in Bahrain against Al-Khalife was like that and millions of people were protesting against the rulers. While in Syria protests were not that big and that wide but American official thought they can push away Bashar al-Assad. They did not succeed to do what they wanted in Syria and because of this after 6 or 7 months after limited political moves, they started the war in this country.

Iran certainly will respond to these offenses by America and Israel but these responses are not always visible and announced.

Dean of strategic studies institute of Andishe Sazane Noor in an answer to the question about the reaction of Iran to America and Israeli attacks to military bases of Iran in Syria and also their attacks to positions of resistance axis said: reaction of Iran to these attacks is dependent on level, extent, and type of their attacks.

He clarified that over all the strategy of Iran against these attacks is not silence. The time of answering to these attacks, How to answer and who should answer to these attacks will be decided in the process of decision-making rooms of Iran. This point is very important that Iran will certainly respond to these offenses by America and Israel but these responses are not always visible and announced.

The cooperation with Russia and reaching to a strategic cooperation level was proposed from the time of Imam Khomeini. The relation between Iran and Russia is the result of 30 years of experience.

In reply to the question that what guarantees are there for Russia’s help to resistance axis in Syria and is it possible that Russia betrays resistance axis or not, He answered for evaluating behavior and performance of Russia which is a big country and has important goals in the region and world we should investigate the behavior and strategic goals of Russia.

Zarei added that the cooperation with Russia and reaching to a strategic cooperation level was proposed from the time of Imam Khomeini and the experience shows that a multilateral relation has started from that time.

Most of what is happening between Iran and Russia is not announced; Iran and Russia have had strategic partnerships to disrupt the conspiracies of color revolutions in the region.

Dean of strategic studies institute of Andishe-Sazane-Noor mentioned that Most of what is happening between Iran and Russia is not announced and one of the strategic cooperation between Iran and Russia have had strategic partnerships to disrupt the conspiracies of color revolutions in the region which had been designed in intelligence circles of the US.

We trust Putin's Russia, and Russia also to the Islamic Republic of Iran; Iran and Russia consider themselves in need of cooperation especially in the field of regional security in the southern borders of Russia to the regions connected to the Indian Ocean.

Zarei added that: We trust Putin's Russia, and Russia also trusts to the Islamic Republic of Iran but to answer to the question that will Russians act according to our approaches and our national benefits or not? The answer is no because we do not act as their approaches too. But the important note is that our benefits and their benefits in many cases are in common.

In responding to the question that to what extent this cooperation will continue he said that: this relatively strategic relation of Russia and Iran will continue for a long time. Iran and Russia consider themselves in need of cooperation especially in the field of regional security in the southern borders of Russia to the regions connected to the Indian Ocean and this is a strategic need.

3 important and determinative factors for Russia in Syria

Dean of the strategic studies institute of Andishe-Sazane-Noor said about the level of cooperation between Iran and Russia in Syria that Russians in the case of Syria have focused on 3 factors: Maintaining the Syrian political system, Failure of US programs against Syria and others and preventing escalation of conflicts in Syria. Zarei added that the idea that to what extent Russia will confront with security threats of the West against Syria, depends on the extent to which each of these three principles is threatened.

 

Comments

Most viewed

Strategic patience and retreat in front of the west is a dec ...
Strategic patience and retreat in front of the west is a dec ...

Zarei said about the level of cooperation between Iran and Russia in Syria that Russians i ...

A look at the formation of Arabic NATO project
A look at the formation of Arabic NATO project

because of tension in the region and disputes between member states the formation of the a ...

Web Analytics